He thought he “lost me” … it’s only been two dates?


Home Forums Dating and Sex Advice He thought he “lost me” … it’s only been two dates?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #775881 Reply
    Farrah

    I’ve went out on two dates with a guy i met through a mutual friend, he’s super cute and funny. We text almost all day. Today was an off day because i was busy with my work and i couldn’t text him back as much. He texted me at 1:30 p. m. and the text said “hey what are you doing?”

    I didn’t see the text until 4:23 pm. As i was typing my reply he sent another text and it said “damn you blocked me” and i responded “no I’m at work”

    He then said “okay i thought i had lost you that quick”

    What did he mean

    #775884 Reply
    Dangerouse

    It means the both of you are children. All that texting.

    #775886 Reply
    Khadija

    Please back off on all this texting. You cannot maintain this amount of communication. Focus on getting to know each other in person. Plus no employer wants an employee texting all day long, you get paid to work not text.

    #775888 Reply
    Anderson

    Dangerouse you’re like the best adult I’ve ever seen for jumping so quickly to label others as children. Autograph please?

    Deviate from anything established as normal/routine in a relation and it will make anyone wonder. Not everyone will point it out, for different reasons, but everyone notices it. You texted tons everyday > suddenly you didn’t > he noticed and it made him wonder. So that part’s fairly normal and understandable

    Him assuming he’d lost you is a little insecure, maybe inexperienced? I appreciate his honesty because many could’ve felt the same but never voiced it.

    He seems transparent, which means you can easily ask him what he meant by it.

    #775900 Reply
    Raven

    He’s needy & possibly controlling…

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Reply To: He thought he “lost me” … it’s only been two dates?
Your information:





<blockquote> <code> <pre> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol start=""> <li>